Gregor Noll is <a href=http://www.jur.lu.se/Internet/Forskare/Noll.nsf target=_blank>professor</a> of international law, Faculty of Law, Lund University
Why did Britain and Denmark choose to reopen the migration debate not long after endorsing the 1952 refugee convention? What did this mean for the resettlement of peoples? [Reposted from openDemocracy, June 2003]
To distribute people, the most sensitive dimension of solidarity, is firstly about sharing norms; the rights of the asylum seekers must be guaranteed in reality, not just in law.
To distribute people, the most sensitive dimension of solidarity, is firstly about sharing norms; the rights of the asylum seekers must be guaranteed in reality, not just in law.
The theological and ideological basis for IS’s struggle visualizes this as a fight against the spiritual power centre of European public international law: Rome.
In Rabat, Morocco, fifty-eight European and African states met on 10-11 July 2006 for a unique conference the Euro-African Ministerial Conference on Migration and Development. Its conclusions, especially the "
Since February 2003, plans by the British government to deport asylum seekers arriving in the UK to new Regional Processing Areas (RPAs) and Transit Processing Centres(TPCs) have gradually leaked
